輔仁大學
學術資源網

記錄編號6240
狀態NC094FJU00058006
助教查核
索書號
學校名稱輔仁大學
系所名稱公共衛生學系
舊系所名稱
學號492926127
研究生(中)張雪會
研究生(英)Chang, Hsueh-Hui
論文名稱(中)老人視力障礙與視覺功能生活品質之流行病學研究
論文名稱(英)An Epidemiological Study of Visual Impairment and Visual Function Related Quality of Life among The Elderly.
其他題名
指導教授(中)李中一
指導教授(英)Dr. Li, Chung-Yi
校內全文開放日期不公開
校外全文開放日期不公開
全文不開放理由
電子全文送交國圖.同意
國圖全文開放日期.2006.06.19
檔案說明電子全文
電子全文01
學位類別碩士
畢業學年度94
出版年
語文別中文
關鍵字(中)老人 視力 視覺功能 篩檢 生活品質 橫斷性研究 流行病學
關鍵字(英)elderly vision visual function screening quality of life cross-sectional study epidemiology
摘要(中)中文摘要 老人視力障礙與視覺功能生活品質之流行病學研究 (全部頁數:178) 研究生:張雪會 指導教授:李中一 博士 學 位:理學碩士 輔仁大學公共衛生學研究所 關鍵字:老人、視力、視覺功能、篩檢、生活品質、橫斷性研究、流行病學 背景和目的:視力障礙盛行率隨著人口老化與疾病型態改變而增加,其中許多患者並沒有接受適當之檢查而錯失了及時矯正治療的機會。本研究旨在了解並比較新竹縣不同地區型態老人之視力障礙盛行率及視覺功能生活品質現況,並進一步探討影響社區老人視力障礙與視覺功能生活品質之人口學與疾病史預測因子,以提供為老人視力照護、社區衛生研究及政策研擬的參考資料。 方法:本研究採橫斷性研究設計,以分層隨機抽樣,選取包括新竹縣四個鄉鎮市(竹北市、關西鎮、峨眉鄉及五峰鄉),共2,006位65歲以上的老人為研究對象,進行視力篩檢及視覺功能生活品質問卷之評估調查,並成功訪視其中之1,392位,完成率69.4%。研究工具包括E字視力表、簡易視力篩檢表、及視覺功能問卷-25 (The 25-item Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25) ),本研究以雙眼表現視力優眼視力在6/12(不含)以下者作為視力障礙之指標,同時計算VFQ-25總分及各個次項目之得分用以評估視覺功能生活品質。所得類別與連續資料分別計算其百分比與平均值;並以卡方檢定、單維變異數分析、邏輯斯迴歸(計算勝算比)、及線性迴歸(計算分數差異)等方法進行統計檢定。 結果:65歲以上老人視力障礙盛行率在四個鄉鎮市樣本中,以峨眉鄉最高(42.5%)、關西鎮最低(20.2%);VFQ-25所有次項目得分中,四個鄉鎮市老人皆以彩色視覺為最高(平均得分為93.1分,其中以竹北市老人得分最高(97.4分)、五峰鄉老人得分最低(82.8分) ),得分最低之次項目則為整體健康(平均得分為33.0分,而以關西鎮老人得分最高(37.6分)、竹北市老人得分最低(30.4分) )。複迴歸分析結果顯示:視力障礙盛行率與地區別、年齡、糖尿病及眼科疾病史有顯著相關,而與性別、教育程度、婚姻、居住狀況、身體質量指數(Body Mass Index, BMI)、高血壓及高血脂症疾病史則是無顯著相關;其次,VFQ-25得分高低與視力障礙、地區別、年齡、性別、教育程度、婚姻、BMI、高血壓、糖尿病及眼科疾病史為顯著相關,而與居住狀況、高血脂症疾病史則無顯著相關;顯著影響VFQ-25所有次項目得分的因素包括視力障礙、地區別及眼科疾病史;而年齡也顯著影響除了開車次項目以外之所有 VFQ-25次項目得分;VFQ-25總分以及各個次項目得分情形顯示,視力障礙者之平均分數均顯著低於視力正常者,其中總分的差異為10.9分,分數差異最大與最小的次項目分別為開車(14.4分)與整體健康(5.5分);整體來看,不同鄉鎮市老人在VFQ-25得分上有顯著差異,其中以五峰鄉老人的得分最低,其VFQ-25得分除整體健康次項目得分略高於竹北市老人外,其餘各個次項目以及總分平均分數均低於其他三個鄉鎮市老人。 結論:本研究發現影響視力障礙盛行率之重要因素為地區別、年齡、糖尿病及眼科疾病史,而影響VFQ-25得分之重要相關因素為視力障礙、地區別、年齡及眼科疾病史。將來社區視力保健工作應特別針對年齡較大、居住較為偏遠、有糖尿病病史、以及有眼科疾病史之老人進行視力篩檢,並加強視力健康照護以及視力保健教育的宣導。此外,本研究也顯示在控制了人口學、疾病史及視力障礙等因素後,不同城鄉地區老人之視覺功能生活品質得分仍有顯著差異,未來研究亦應針對不同城鄉地區進一步調查其影響視覺功能生活品質之因素。 關鍵詞:老人、視力、視覺功能、篩檢、生活品質、橫斷性研究、流行病學
摘要(英)Abstract An Epidemiological Study of Visual Impairment and Visual Function Related Quality of Life among The Elderly. (Total Pages 178 ) AUTHOR: Chang, Hsueh-Hui SUPERVISOR:Dr. Li, Chung-Yi DEGREE: Master of Science in Public Health Dept of Public Health, College of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University KEY WORD: elderly, vision, visual function, screening, quality of life, cross-sectional study, epidemiology BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The prevalence of visual impairment increases as a result of the growth of elderly population and changes of disease pattern. Many elderly people do not receive timely and appropriate eye treatment since they are not examined. This study was conducted to characterize and compare the prevalence rates of visual impairment and scores of visual function related quality of life (VFRQOL) among the elderly people living in four districts with different ways of living in Hisn-Chu County. Further analyses were also performed to explore demographic characteristics and disease histories that could significantly predict visual capability and VFRQOL. Results from this study may be of help to the health policy toward eye care of the elderly, community health research, and policy formulation. METHODS: This study used a cross-sectional design. Using a stratified random sampling technique, we selected a total of 2,006 elderly participants aged 65 and more and lived in four townships (Jhubei, Guansi, Emei, and Wufong) of Hsin-Chu County. Each study participant received an eye screening for visual impairment and was administered a questionnaire for VFRQOL. A total of 1,392 study participants completed the interview, representing a response rate of 69.4%. Instrument used in this study included the Snellen E chart, the simplified visual acuity card, and the 25-item Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25). The study participants whose presenting visual acuity of the better eye was worst than 6/12 were classified as subjects with visual impairment. The study also calculated the total score and sub-scale scores of VFQ-25 to indicate an individual’s VFRQOL. Percentage and mean were calculated for description of categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Statistical testing was performed with various techniques including Chi-square test, One-way analysis of variance, logistic regression (calculation of odds ratios), and linear regression (calculation of the difference in score). RESULTS: The highest and lowest prevalence rate of visual impairment was observed in Emei and Guansi, respectively. Among the VFQ-25 sub-scales, the highest score was noted for “color vision” irrespective of the study township (average score was 93.1, the highest and lowest township-specific score was noted for Jhubei (97.4) and Wufong (82.8), respectively). The lowest sub-scale specific score was observed for “general health” (average score of 33.0) with the highest and lowest township-specific score noted for Guansi (37.6) and Jhubei (30.4). Results from multivariate analyses indicated that prevalence of visual impairment was significantly associated with township of living, age, diabetes, and eye disorder, but not with gender, education, marital status, living condition, body mass index (BMI), and histories of hypertension and hyperlipidemia. Additionally, the total score of VFQ-25 can be significantly predicted by the factors including visual impairment, township of living, age, gender, education, marital status, BMI, and disease histories of hypertension, diabetes, and eye disorders, but was unrelated to living condition and hyperlipidemia. Moreover, visual impairment, township of living, and eye disorders were factors that can significantly predict scores of all VFQ-25 subs-scales; and age was also a significant predictor for all VFQ-25 subs-scales except “driving”. As compared to the healthy subjects, the study participants with visual impairment tended to experience a significantly reduced VFQ-25 total score and scores of all sub-scales. The largest and smallest difference associated with visual impairment was “driving” (14.4) and “general health” (5.5). Overall, there was a significant difference in VFQ-25 score between four townships, and the elderly in Wefong township had the least total score and scores of nearly all sub-scales except for “general health” for which the elderly in Jhubei township experienced the least score. CONCLUSION: We found that the prevalence of visual impairment was significantly associated with township of living, age, diabetes, and eye disorder. Additionally, visual impairment, township of living, and eye disorders were factors that can significantly predict scores of all VFQ-25 subs-scales. In the future, community visual health care should deliver its visual screen program to the elderly people who are older, living in rural, with the history of diabetes, and eye disorder. Moreover, visual health care and visual health education should also be further enforced. Besides, after adjustment for the demographic characteristics, the history of disease, and visual impairment, we still noted a significant geographic variation in the score of VFRQOL. Future studies should aim to explore the specific factors that may be responsible for such geographic variation. KEY WORDS: elderly, vision, visual function, screening, quality of life, cross-sectional study, epidemiology
論文目次目錄 中文摘要 I ABSTRACT IV 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究目的 5 第二章 文獻回顧 6 第一節 視力障礙之定義與評估 6 第二節 視覺功能生活品質之定義與評估 12 第三節 視力障礙的盛行率及其影響因素 19 第四節 影響視覺功能生活品質之相關因素 30 第三章 研究方法 36 第一節 研究設計 36 第二節 取樣方法 37 第三節 研究工具之信效度評估 40 第四節 執行過程 44 第五節 統計分析 48 第四章 研究結果 50 第一節 研究工具及其信效度分析 50 第二節 視力障礙盛行率及其相關因素 52 第三節 視覺功能生活品質得分及其相關因素 56 第五章 討論與結論 67 第一節 本研究摘要發現 67 第二節 本研究的限制和優點 77 第三節 本研究在公共衛生與社區醫學上的意義 84 第六章 參考資料 86 中文部分 86 英文部分 89 圖目錄 99 圖2-1-1. E字視力表及C字視力表 99 圖2-1-2. 簡易視力篩檢表 99 圖2-1-3. 眼睛的可見度 100 圖2-1-4. 雙眼的立體視覺 100 圖2-1-5. 指揮棒 100 圖 2-1-6. 遮眼器 100 圖3-2-1. 各鄉鎮市研究對象之完訪流程與完成數 101 表目錄 102 表3-2-1. 研究鄉鎮市之抽樣人數與實際完成收案人數 102 表3-2-2. 研究鄉鎮市未完成收案之原因分析 102 表3-2-3. 研究鄉鎮市之問卷訪視及視力篩檢完成率 103 表4-1-1. 先驅研究受測老人之基本資料 104 表4-1-2. E字視力表與簡易視力篩檢表初測得之視力比較 105 表4-1-3. 簡易視力篩檢表初測之再現性評估 105 表4-1-4. VFQ-25問卷專家效度分析測得之分數 106 表4-2-1. 研究對象之基本資料 107 表4-2-2. 新竹縣四個鄉鎮市使用E字視力表其視力障礙盛行率比較 109 表4-2-3. 新竹縣四個鄉鎮市使用簡易視力篩檢表其視力障礙盛行率比較 109 表4-2-4. 新竹縣四個鄉鎮市之整體視力1其視力障礙盛行率比較 110 表4-2-5. 影響老人雙眼視力障礙相關因素之複邏輯斯迴歸分析 111 表4-3-1. 竹北地區VFQ-25得分與視覺功能生活品質各變項比較 112 表4-3-2. 關西地區VFQ-25得分與視覺功能生活品質各變項比較 112 表4-3-3. 峨眉地區VFQ-25得分與視覺功能生活品質各變項比較 113 表4-3-4. 五峰地區VFQ-25得分與視覺功能生活品質各變項比較 113 表4-3-5. 不同地區VFQ-25所測得分與視覺功能生活品質比較 114 表4-3-6. 影響VFQ-25整體健康次項目得分相關因素之迴歸分析 115 表4-3-7. 影響VFQ-25整體視力次項目得分相關因素之迴歸分析 116 表4-3-8. 影響VFQ-25眼睛疼痛次項目得分相關因素之迴歸分析 117 表4-3-9. 影響VFQ-25近距離視力次項目得分相關因素之迴歸分析 118 表4-3-10. 影響VFQ-25遠距離視力次項目得分相關因素之迴歸分析 119 表4-3-11. 影響VFQ-25特殊視力次項目得分相關因素之迴歸分析 120 表4-3-12. 影響VFQ-25社交功能次項目得分相關因素之迴歸分析 121 表4-3-13. 影響VFQ-25心理健康次項目得分相關因素之迴歸分析 122 表4-3-14. 影響VFQ-25角色受限次項目得分相關因素之迴歸分析 123 表4-3-15. 影響VFQ-25依賴次項目得分相關因素之迴歸分析 124 表4-3-16. 影響VFQ-25開車次項目得分相關因素之迴歸分析 125 表4-3-17. 影響VFQ-25彩色視覺次項目得分相關因素之迴歸分析 126 表4-3-18. 影響VFQ-25周邊視力次項目得分相關因素之迴歸分析 127 表4-3-19. 影響VFQ-25總分得分相關因素之迴歸分析 128 表4-3-20. VFQ-25各次項目與總分之各別顯著相關因子組成2 129 附錄附錄 132 附錄一 新竹縣眼科醫師分佈圖 132 附錄二 VFQ-25原翻譯者同意書 133 附錄四 參與問卷內容效度之專家名單 137 附錄五 視覺功能問卷及視力篩檢同意書 138 附錄六 研究對象基本資料 139 附錄七 視覺功能研究工具--問卷 140 附錄八 問卷邏輯 152 附錄九 步驟一:將各題原回答選項轉換為得分 155 附錄十 步驟二:平均各次項目總和為VFQ-25各次項目得分 156 附錄十一 新竹縣四個鄉鎮市視力障礙盛行率之比較 157 附錄十二 地區別VFQ-25總分得分相關因素之迴歸分析 162
參考文獻中文部分 內政統計資訊服務網:主要國家65歲以上人口占總人口比率。2004 June 6th (cited 2005 June 26) Available from: URL: http://www.moi.gov.tw /stat。 內政部社會司:身心障礙等級,行政規則,身心障礙福利相關法規。2003 (cited 2005 June 26) Available from: http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/05/new05. htm 文良彥等:終結白內障消除霧化的視覺。台北市:宏欣文化事業有限公司,2004。 史麗珠:台灣地區老年性白內障之流行病學研究,台灣大學公共衛生學研究所博士論文,1996。 杞昭安:視覺障礙老人安養問題之研究。特殊教育研究學刊2001;20:147-169。 林隆光:學幼童視力及立體感篩檢工作手冊。教育部。2004 November 19th (cited 2005 June 26)Available from: URL: http://www.edu.tw/EDU_ WEB/EDU_MGT/PHYSICAL/EDU7663001/health/931119150334.doc 林隆光:學童視力保健。台北市,健康文化事業股份有限公司,2001。 林隆光等:臺北縣金山鄉中老年人視力障礙狀態之調查。慈濟醫學2001;13:75-79。 林嘉理:先天與後天性色盲。財團法人尹書田紀念醫院,書田泌尿科眼科診所。2005 May 20th (cited 2005 June 26) Available from: URL: http://www.shutien.org.tw/0117_011.htm 姚開屏: 簡介與評論常用的一般性健康相關生活品質量表兼談對未來研究的建議。測驗年刊2000;47:111-38。 姚開屏:健康相關生活品質概念與測量原理之簡介。台灣醫界2002; 6:183-192。 施永豐:色盲乎? --色覺異常。健康世界1998; 147:101-5。 洪柏廷等:淺說青光眼—預防、診療、保健的介紹。台北市,宏欣文化事業有限公司,2004。 馬偕紀念醫院眼科:青光眼簡介。2002 November 13th (cited 2005 June 26)Available from: URL: http://www2.mmh.org.tw/oph/glaucoma.htm 張朝凱等:看見清楚與美麗:眼科疾病的治療保健與雷射近視手術。台北市,宏欣文化事業有限公司,2005。 莊文信:中大調查發現本港五分一老人有視力障礙。2002 November 13th(cited 2005 June 26)Available from: URL: http://www.cuhk.edu.hk/ipro /pressrelease/990416c.htm 陳慕師:糖尿病友發生視力障礙的原因。糖尿病家族2002;4:4-7。 朝陽科技大學:視野及視量測畫面。人因工程實驗室。2000 July 12th (cited 2005 June 26) Available from: URL: http://www.cyut.edu.tw/~hcchen /%B9%EA%C5%E7%B3%E6%A4%B8/%B5%F8%B3%A5%A4%CE%B5%F8%A4O%B6q%B4%FA.htm 程景煜等:台灣地區老人視力與眼及現況。中華民國眼科醫學會主編:中老年視覺問題診療指引手冊(2003)。台中市:行政院衛生署國民健康局,2003。 黃秀蕙等:新竹縣老人視覺功能與生活品質的社區性研究(2005)。台中:行政院衛生署國民健康局2005;13-15。 新竹縣衛生局:保健課。91-93年老人視篩統計.xls,2004。 新竹縣衛生局:新竹縣各鄉鎮市歷年(70-93)人口數及93年老年人口比較。2003 August 8th (cited 2005 June 26) Available from: URL:http://www.hsinchu.gov.tw/_upload/staticpaper/138/新竹縣各鄉鎮70-93年人口數.xls 新竹縣衛生局:新竹縣醫療資源分佈概況(95.02).xls。2006 March 20th (cited 2006 March 23) Available from: URL http://www.hsinchu.gov.tw/_upload/staticpaper/883/新竹縣醫療資源分佈概況(95.02).xls 褚仁遠等人:眼病學。第一版。中國:人民衛生出版社,2005。 蔡景耀等:社區老人視力障礙盛行率及其相關因子。北市醫學雜誌2004;1:344-51。 蔡景耀等:臺北市與馬祖地區老人視力障礙盛行率與原因的社區性研究。中華民國眼科醫學會雜誌2003;42:178-86。 英文部分 Agresti A. Categorical data analysis: New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1990. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression.Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961;4:561-71. Bellan L. Why are patients with no visual symptoms on cataract waiting lists? Can J Ophthalmol 2005;40:433-8. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS. The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care 1981;19:787-805. Bernth-Petersen P. A change in indications for cataract surgery? A 10 year comparative epidemiologic study. Acta Ophthalmol 1981;59:206-10. Blyth C, Still H. Binomial confidence intervals. J Am Stat Assoc 1983;78:108-16. Booth-Kewley S, Friedman HS. Psychological predictors of heart disease: a quantitative review. Psychol Bull 1987;101:343-62. Bremond-Gignac D, Tixier J, Missotten T, Laroche L, Beresniak A. Evaluation of the quality of life in ophthalmology. Presse Med 2002;19;31:1607-12. Brown MM, Brown GC, Sharma S, Landy J, Bakal J. Quality of life with visual acuity loss from diabetic retinopathy and age-related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:481-4. Cahill MT, Banks AD, Stinnett SS, Toth CA. Vision-related quality of life in patients with bilateral severe age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2005;112:152-8. Carabellese C, Appollonio I, Rozzini R, Bianchetti A, Frisoni GB, Frattola L, Trabucchi M. Sensory impairment and quality of life in a community elderly population. J Am Geriatr Soc 1993;41:401-7. Chen JH, Xu L, Hu AL, Sun BC, Li JJ, Ma K, Xia CR, Cui TT, Zheng YY, Li YB, Zhang RX, Yang H, Sun XY, Zou Y, Wang Y, Ma BR. Prevalence of low vision and blindness in defined populations in rural and urban areas in Beijing. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2003;83:1413-8. Chia EM, Wang JJ, Rochtchina E, Smith W, Cumming OR, Mitchell P. Impact of Bilateral Visual Impairment on Health-Related Quality of Life: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:71-6. Cid-Ruzafa J, Damian-Moreno J. [Disability evaluation: Barthel's index]. Rev Esp Salud Publica 1997;71:127-37. Cole SR, Beck RW, Moke PS, Gal RL, Long DT. The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire: experience of the ONTT. Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:1017-21. Cusick M, SanGiovanni JP, Chew EY, Csaky KG, Hall-Shimel K, Reed GF, Caruso RC, Ferris FL 3rd. Central visual function and the NEI-VFQ-25 near and distance activities subscale scores in people with type 1 and 2 diabetes. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;139:1042-50. Dargent-Molina P, Favier F, Grandjean H, Baudoin C, Schott AM, HausheOR E, Meunier PJ, Breart G. Fall-related factors and risk of hip fracture: the EPIDOS prospective study. Lancet 1996;348:145-9. de Boer MR, de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Moll AC, Volker-Dieben HJ, van Rens GH. Changes to the subscales of two vision-related quality of life questionnaires are proposed. J Clin Epidemiol 2005;58:1260-8. de Boer MR, Pluijm SM, Lips P, Moll AC, Volker-Dieben HJ, Deeg DJ, van Rens GH. Different aspects of visual impairment as risk factors for falls and fractures in older men and women. J Bone Miner Res 2004;19:1539-47. Desai P, Reidy A, Minassian DC, Vafidis G, Bolger J. Gains from cataract surgery: visual function and quality of life. Br J Ophthalmol 1996;80:868-73. Dimitrov PN, Mukesh BN, McCarty CA, Taylor HR. Five-year incidence of bilateral cause-specific visual impairment in the Melbourne Visual Impairment Project. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:5075-81 Duh EJ, Aiello LP. Basic Pathobiology of the eye and its complications. Ellenberg & Rifkin's Diabetes Mellitus: New York: McGraw-Hill; 2002. Elliott DB, Hurst MA, Weatherill J. Comparing clinical tests of visual function in cataract with the patient's perceived visual disability. Eye 1990;4 :712-7 Evans JR, Fletcher AE, Wormald RP, Ng ES, Stirling S, Smeeth L, Breeze E, Bulpitt CJ, Nunes M, Jones D, Tulloch A. Prevalence of visual impairment in people aged 75 years and older in Britain: results from the MRC trial of assessment and management of older people in the community. Br J Ophthalmol 2002 ;86:795-800. Friedman DS, Tielsch JM, Vitale S, Bass EB, Schein OD, Steinberg EP. VF-14 item specific responses in patients undergoing first eye cataract surgery: can the length of the VF-14 be reduced? Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:885-91. Garratt AM, Ruta DA, Abdalla MI, Buckingham JK, Russell IT. The SF36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS? BMJ 1993;306:1440-4. Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD. Performance profiles of the functional independence measure. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1993;72:84-9. Hazel CA, Petre KL, Armstrong RA, Benson MT, Frost NA. Visual function and subjective quality of life compared in subjects with acquired macular disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:1309-15 Hinds A, Sinclair A, Park J, Suttie A, Paterson H, Macdonald M. Impact of an interdisciplinary low vision service on the quality of life of low vision patients. Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:1391-6. Hsu WM, Cheng CY, Liu JH, Tsai SY, Chou P. Prevalence and causes of visual impairment in an elderly Chinese population in Taiwan: the Shihpai Eye Study. Ophthalmology 2004;111:62-9. Iliffe S, Kharicha K, Harari D, Swift C, Gillmann G, Stuck A. Self-reported visual function in healthy older people in Britain: an exploratory study of associations with age, sex, depression, education and income. Fam Pract 2005;22:585-90. Ivers RQ, Norton R, Cumming RG, Butler M, Campbell AJ. Visual impairment and risk of hip fracture. Am J Epidemiol 2000;152:633-9. Jampel HD, Friedman DS, Quigley H, Miller R. Correlation of the binocular visual field with patient assessment of vision. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:1059-67. Kaplan RM, Atkins CJ, Timms R. Validity of a quality of well-being scale as an outcome measure in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Chronic Dis 1984;37:85-95. Katz S, Downs TD, Cash HR, Grotz RC. Progress in development of the index of ADL. Gerontologist 1970;10:20-30. Keeffe JE, Lovie-Kitchin JE, Maclean H, Taylor HR. A simplified screening test for the identification of individuals with diminished vision in developing countries. Rev Panam Salud Publica 1998;3:220-6. Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FS. The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. Adv Clin Rehabil 1987;1: 6-18. Klein BE, Klein R, Lee KE, Cruickshanks KJ. Associations of performance-based and self-reported measures of visual function. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 1999;6:49-60. Landis JR, Koch GG. The agreement of observer agreement for Categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-74. Lavery JR, Gibson JM, Shaw DE, Rosenthal AR. Vision and the visual acuity in an elderly population. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1988;8:390-3. Lee BL, Gutierrez P, Gordon M, Wilson MR, Cioffi GA, Ritch R, Sherwood M, Mangione CM. The Glaucoma Symptom Scale. A brief index of glaucoma-specific symptoms. Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116:861-6. Lindblad AS, Clemons TE. Responsiveness of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire to progression to advanced age-related macular degeneration, vision loss, and lens opacity. Arch Ophthalmol 2005 ;123:1207-14. Liu JH, Cheng CY, Chen SJ, Lee FL. Visual impairment in a Taiwanese population: prevalence, causes, and socioeconomic factors. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2001;8:339-50. Lukkarinen H, Hentinen M. Assessment of quality of life with the Nottingham Health Profile among patients with coronary heart disease. J Adv Nurs 1997;26:73-84. Lundstrom M, Brege KG, Floren I, Lundh B, Stenevi U, Thorburn W. Cataract surgery and quality of life in patients with age related macular degeneration. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:1330-5. Lundstrom M, Fregell G, Sjoblom A. Vision related daily life problems in patients waiting for a cataract extraction. Br J Ophthalmol 1994;78:608-11. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: The Barthel index. Maryland State Medical Journal 1965;14:61-5. Mangione CM, BeORy S, Spritzer K, Janz NK, Klein R, Owsley C, Lee PP. Identifying the content area for the 51-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire: results from focus groups with visually impaired persons. Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116:227-33. Mangione CM, Lee PP, Gutierrez PR, Spritzer K, Berry S, Hays RD. National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire Field Test Investigators: Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25). Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:1050-8. Mangione CM, Phillips RS, Seddon JM, Lawrence MG, Cook EF, Dailey R, Goldman L. Development of the 'Activities of Daily Vision Scale'. A measure of visual functional status. Med Care 1992;30:1111-26. Mangione CM. Version 2000. The National Eye Institute 25-Item. Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25). NEI VFQ-25 Scoring Algorithm – August 2000(cited 2005 June 26). Available from: URL: http://www.nei.nih.gov/resources/visionfunction/manual_cm2000.pdf Massof RW, Rubin GS: Visual function assessment questionnaires. Surv Ophthalmol 2001;45:531-48. McDowell I, Jenkinson C. Development standards for health measures. J Health Serv Res Policy 1996;1:238-46 Negrel AD, Minassian DC, Sayek F. Blindness and low vision in southeast Turkey. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 1996;3:127-34. NEI. National Eye Health Education Program (NEHEP): Communication Plan: A Glaucoma Public Education Program. 1994. November (cited 2005 June 26).Available from: http://www.nei.nih.gov/nehep/plans/glaucplan.asp Neugarten BL, Havighurst RJ, Tobin SS. The measurement of life satisfaction. J Gerontol 1961;16:134-43. Nordmann JP, Auzanneau N, Ricard S, Berdeaux G. Vision related quality of life and topical glaucoma treatment side effects. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003;1:75. Pacheco-Cutillas M, Edgar DF, Sahraie A. Acquired colour vision defects in glaucoma—their detection and clinical significance. Br J Ophthalmol 1999;83:1396–402 Pfeffer RI, Kurosaki TT, Harrah CH Jr, Chance JM, Filos S. Measurement of functional activities in older adults in the community. J Gerontol 1982;37:323-9. Reidy A, Minassian DC, Vafidis G, Joseph J, FaORow S, Wu J, Desai P, Connolly A. Prevalence of serious eye disease and visual impairment in a north London population: population based, cross sectional study. BrMJ 1998;316:1643-6. Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etya'ale D, Kocur I, Pararajasegaram R, Pokharel GP, Mariotti SP. Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull World Health Organ 2004;82:844-51. Rovner BW, Zisselman PM, Shmuely-Dulitzki Y. Depression and disability in older people with impaired vision: a follow-up study. J Am Geriatr Soc 1996;44:181-4. Rowe S, MacLean CH, Shekelle PG .Preventing Visual Loss From Chronic Eye Disease in Primary Care. JAMA 2004;291:1487-95. Scott IU, Schein OD, West S, Bandeen-Roche K, Enger C, Folstein MF. Functional status and quality of life measurement among ophthalmic patients. Arch Ophthalmol 1994;112:329-35. Sherbourne CD, Stewart AL. The MOS social support survey. Soc Sci Med 1991;32:705-14. Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O'Connell KA; WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res 2004;13:299-310. Steinberg EP, Tielsch JM, Schein OD, Javitt JC, Sharkey P, Cassard SD, Legro MW, Diener-West M, Bass EB, Damiano AM, et al. National study of cataract surgery outcomes. Variation in 4-month postoperative outcomes as reflected in multiple outcome measures. Ophthalmology 1994;101:1131-40; discussion 1140-1. Submacular Surgery Trials Research Group. Health- and vision-related quality of life among patients with ocular histoplasmosis or idiopathic choroidal neovascularization at enrollment in a randomized trial of submacular surgery: Submacular Surgery Trials Report No. 5. Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:78-88. Taylor HR, Keeffe JE, Vu HT, Wang JJ, Rochtchina E, Pezzullo ML, Mitchell P. Vision loss in Australia. Med J Aust 2005;182:565-8. Taylor HR. Refractive Error. Eye Care for the Community. 2005 Oct 7 th (cited 2005 June 26). Available from: URL: http://iris.medoph.unimelb.edu.au /eyecarecommunity/refractive.html Toprak AB, Eser E, Guler C, Baser FE, Mayali H. Cross-validation of the Turkish version of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ 25). Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2005;12:259-69. Tsai CY, Woung LC, Chou P, Yang CS, Sheu MM, Wu JR, Chuang TL, Tung TH. The current status of visual disability in the elderly population of Taiwan. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2005;49:166-72. Tsai SY, Chi LY, Cheng CY, Hsu WM, Liu JH, Chou P. The impact of visual impairment and use of eye services on health-related quality of life among the elderly in Taiwan: the Shihpai Eye Study. Qual Life Res 2004;13:1415-24. Uy HS, Munoz VM. Comparison of the potential acuity meter and pinhole tests in predicting postoperative visual acuity after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:548-52. van der Pols JC, Bates CJ, McGraw PV, Thompson JR, Reacher M, Prentice A, Finch S. Visual acuity measurements in a national sample of British elderly people. Br J Ophthalmol 2000;84:165-70. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-83. Ware JE Jr. Conceptualizing disease impact and treatment outcomes. Cancer 1984;53:2316-23. Watt WS. How Visual Acuity Is Measured. 2004 Nov 7th (cited 2005 June 26).Available from: URL: http://www.mdsupport.org/library/acuity.html WHO. Prevention of Blindness & Deafness, Geneva, 4-5 September 2003. 2005 May 3th (cited 2005 June 26). Available from: URL: http://whqlibdoc. who.int/hq/2003/WHO_PBL_03.91.pdf#search='Prevention%20of%20Blindness%20%26%20Deafness%2C%20Geneva%2C%2045%20September%202003.' WHO. The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med 1998;46:1569-85. WHO. VISION 2020 action plans to combat blindness. 2004a. Oct 22 th (cited 2005 June 26).Available from: URL: http://www.who.int/ncd/ vision2020_ actionplan/contents/2.1.htm WHO. VISION 2020 slides.pdf. 2004b. Oct 14 th (cited 2005 June 26). Available from: URL: http://www.v2020.org/toolkit/documents/ VISION% 202020%20slides.PDF Wilson IB, Cleary PD. Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA 1995;273:59-65. Wittenberg S. Pinhole eyewear systems: a special report. J Am Optom Assoc. 1993;64:112-6. Wormald RP, Wright LA, Courtney P, Beaumont B, Haines AP. Visual problems in the elderly population and implications for services. BrMJ 1992;304:1226-9. Xu L, Li J, Cui T, Hu A, Zheng Y, Li Y, Sun B, Ma B, Jonas JB. Visual acuity in northern China in an urban and rural population: the Beijing Eye Study. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:1089-93. Zainal M, Ismail SM, Ropilah AR, Elias H, Arumugam G, Alias D, Fathilah J, Lim TO, Ding LM, Goh PP. Prevalence of blindness and low vision in Malaysian population: results from the National Eye Survey 1996. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:951-6.
論文頁數178
附註
全文點閱次數
資料建置時間
轉檔日期
全文檔存取記錄
異動記錄M admin Y2008.M7.D3 23:18 61.59.161.35